cav sri

**gazzasri** · 31-12-2005 19:38

does anyone no what the bhp is on a j reg 1998 cc cav sri not red top engine

**Mr M3** · 31-12-2005 20:33

130 mate

**BlackIce** · 31-12-2005 21:36

Its the SEH engine, miles better than the red top rubbish imo, revs better, fuel economy is better and insurance is miles cheaper

**GlasgowRob** · 31-12-2005 21:40

watch out black ice slagging redtops thats a hanging offence round these here parts

**BlackIce** · 31-12-2005 21:43

Dont give a crap, the red top is a good engine compaired with other manufacturers 2.0 16v lumps, but the SEH came along before the XE did and although it didnt like catalytic convertors, I've owned and driven cars powered by both and imo the SEH was by far a better engine. You never had to worry about porous heads or whether it had a coscast jobbie fitted, it was just 130bhp of torquey, well made mechanics

**Mr M3** · 31-12-2005 21:45

While we're going down that road, the NE was better still. Never got beat by same cars with SEH's in any of mine, and had the torque for the long ratio'd box, awesome for motorway.

**Kieran** · 01-01-2006 01:15

A J-reg SRi could have a C20NE instead of a 20SEH. If it's got a CAT and a lambda sensor, it's 115bhp. Pretty sure all Cav SRis were insurance group 10 whether they had an 8v or a 16v.

**BlackIce** · 01-01-2006 08:23

My H-reg SRi 130bhp was a group 12

**gazzasri** · 02-01-2006 09:35

cheers people

Thread: cav sri

LinkBack

Thread Tools

cav sri

Posting Permissions