Ladies/Gents
Houston, we have a problem. The rolling road event we did recently is booked in for the next issue of the magazine, which means I'm currently compiling the details as we speak. The problem we have is that the figures obtained on the day were wheel figures, all well and good but we all generally work on flywheel figures.
I was told by HQ that they would calculate the flywheel figures and forward them to me but as of yet and despite several phone calls, we no further forward and basically doesn't look like we will be any time soon either.
So, that leaves us with a bit of an issue as the figures are all over the place. Many of you estimated teh flywheel figures (as would I) but it's wheel figures we have. So if you said say 260bhp, the actual figure is 180bhp which doesn't read that well. The options are:
1. I can either re-essitmate your initial figures into wheel figures using some common sense and a bit of carefull fudging! Ie, if you estimated 269bhp at the fly and ran 180bhp at the wheels, I can change your estimate to say 175bhp or thereabouts.
OR
2. I can enter the wheel figures into a on-line flywheel calculator and use them, but that's about as acurate as Stevie Wonder with a shotgun. ie, Stevie estimated 560 at the fly, it recorded 415 at the wheels and running it through the calculator gives an estimated 467bhp. However, it does not account for tranmission loos/drag etc... so pretty useless really.
Ultimately, it's going to be a bit of a clusterfcuk so I need your opinion on what you would prefer so I cane somehow salvage this.
Apologies, and cheers!




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
means I can ruffly say that the corsa is in the region of 90/95bhp so I'm happy with that given that its standard as pan bread.
