coscast vs gm heads
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: coscast vs gm heads

  1. #1
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    2,831
    Drives
    saab 93 viggen

    coscast vs gm heads

    whats the real difference between them?other then the purase head problem,if you have a gm head that has been repaired what is better about a coscast?
    1999 saab 9-3 viggen 2.3 turbo

  2. Remove Advertisements
    MigWeb.co.uk
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    stockport/manchester
    Posts
    657
    Drives
    150 bhp 8v nova
    it really depends on the age of the head, the very early coscast heads had stronger valves and guides, but the later ones are amost identicle
    my girlfriend told me nova was a crappy chav's car!!

    now i'm single

  4. #3
    Rs1
    Rs1 is offline
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    8,608
    Drives
    C20LET
    There 2 types of gm(ks) head, one of which the material is a bit soft....therefore ****,lol.
    Apparently through ****loads of heat cycles the headbolts/studs lose torque??
    The other ks if well repaired should be fine. If your going to the point of heaving in ported and big valves etc. there really no need to search high n low for a coscast. The early coscast do have bigger guides but you should have any probelms with the smaller, be it iron or bronze. The bronze are just more forgiving, should you bend a valve your less likly to have bits of guide floating round your engine.
    "THE ROB"

  5. #4
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Oswestry
    Posts
    1,363
    Drives
    corsa c 1.3
    thats what bronze guides are for aha...
    I have a coscast off a let with round tooth type pulleys, does that mean its the stronger type?

  6. #5
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    2,953
    Drives
    Nova Turbo, Civic Type R
    The earlier Coscast won't have GM stamped on the dizzy end. If its on a LET its not going to be a really early one unless its been changed at some point.

  7. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    worcs
    Posts
    777
    Drives
    like its leased
    I guess...but could be wrong....

    the spec on the GTE's were good early on - then the recession hit hard sales slumped and cheaper materials / workmanship was sought....yuppy traders hanged themselves etc after loosing loads ££££££££...yuppies werent buying many fast cars anymore
    the insurance companies hit the hot hatch market.....killed it

    Cranks were lighter and stronger / flywheels the same / costcasts had good flow and build material....then the Accountants moved in and GM cut corners to suit

  8. #7
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    6,980
    Drives
    Cav with TB's & lots
    This has been covered lots on here. loads of info if you search.

    You guys have missed out that as STANDARD the early CosCast heads had approx 1mm bigger inlet tracts (hence they flow more as standard).

    They will also except bigger inlets in the OE seats.

    As for bronze and iron guides - IIRC it is more todo with bronze offering less friction than iron (important at high revs and heat build up), as well as bronze being a better conductor of heat to take the exhaust steam heat away from the valve. NOTE: no head came with bronze guides as standard.
    Colsobro guides will only cost you about £100 the set plus another £80 for a propoer fitting job. Then of course you need to work them a bit, check clearences and ream them if needed.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts