+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 78

Thread: Section cut C20XE-C20LET head pictures?

  1. #51
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NORTH LONDON
    Posts
    2,221
    Drives
    Calibra Turbo
    Quote Originally Posted by Rs1 View Post
    OK, yeah i get that its trying to focus the charge toward the point of ignition but just of looking at those pics i was wondering if there was an exact science to the placement of the cuts. If you draw multiple lines through each cut you'll notice they dont actually line up with the point of igniton...there close but as there are both not angled spot on and in both cases(2v&4v) the disruption of flow down each cut will....nulify the effect??
    The multiple lines hve two purpose, 1) to direct charge towards spark plug during the compression stage. 2) to spread the flame on the combustion stage
    111 BHP@6,300 - 121 Ib-ft@2,500 - 3,200 from a 1400 SR with modified C14SE head, weber 32/34 on varijet inlet manifold, magnex 2" bore S/S exhaust system! Woohoo

  2. #52
    Rs1
    Rs1 is offline
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    8,007
    Drives
    LET...coming soon
    Quote Originally Posted by B8 GHY View Post
    The multiple lines hve two purpose, 1) to direct charge towards spark plug during the compression stage. 2) to spread the flame on the combustion stage
    Isn't that what you said before
    I know what its meant to do but i'm asking about the degree of accuracy in the actaul machining with regards to 1) The amount of cuts. 2) The angle of each cut.
    Basicly what i'm saying is, if your wanting to direct the charge at the point of igniton then do exaclty that, the pics in this thread are......not exactly pin point accurate, will this make any differance? If the cut direction disects one or more other cuts will the flow of charge be disrupted at all? I'm only thinking along these lines as the combustion chamber design is quite critical in the first place, surly any mods should be done with the same attention to detail/accuracy as the original design??
    Also how do we know the spead and spread of the flame front is not already at a optimal amount and what we would be doing by making the cuts isn't actually taking away from the end result....in my case maximum power??
    "THE ROB"

  3. #53
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Braintree, Essex
    Posts
    1,595
    Drives
    Mk3 Astra
    In research, the grooves are milled. Best cutter would be a ball end. Depth starts off 0,5-1.0mm. Angle of groove depth is around 5 degrees. Sharp edges should be dressed. Other shapes have been tried to increase turbulence further or to induce swirl within the piston bowl or chamber.
    Speed of the flame front is measured using special equipment and in all tests show an increase in flame speed. Power is always increased over base output.
    Read the research papers if you are more interested.
    Cylinder head modification, Flowbench testing, Intake and exhaust system design.
    PM for details.

  4. #54
    Rs1
    Rs1 is offline
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    8,007
    Drives
    LET...coming soon
    Cheers Stefan, need to read more into this.
    "THE ROB"

  5. #55
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NORTH LONDON
    Posts
    2,221
    Drives
    Calibra Turbo
    Believe or not on the 2v heads it defo works, as most 2v heads have a squash band one or both sides. If you look at a normal 2v head you'll notice it has a D shape chamber, whereas a lean burn has a half a circle curve that points to the spark plug.

    On the 4v head the spark plug is bang in the centre but it does two small squash band, which force all the charge to centre of the chamber but rob vortex(turbalance). The bigger the chamber the longer time it takes to for the flame front to spread...

    top gear is on so I'll explain after
    Last edited by B8 GHY; 04-03-2007 at 21:26.
    111 BHP@6,300 - 121 Ib-ft@2,500 - 3,200 from a 1400 SR with modified C14SE head, weber 32/34 on varijet inlet manifold, magnex 2" bore S/S exhaust system! Woohoo

  6. #56
    Rs1
    Rs1 is offline
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    8,007
    Drives
    LET...coming soon
    Cool, with pics if you could.
    "THE ROB"

  7. #57
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    When I first got involved with this several years ago I would cut one groove pointed
    directly at the spark plug. I did about twenty engines this way then decided to copy
    ideas from others and add a few of my own ideas. More grooves provide more benefit
    especially when the squish area is large. I have reduced ignition advance requirements
    as much as 6 - 10 degrees with the one groove layout


    I use a 1.5 mm ball end mill to cut the initial groove. Finishing is done by hand with
    a file opening the outlet into the chamber to 3 mm. I carefully check deck thickness
    before deciding on groove depth, normality I cut 1-2 mm deep, deeper at the chamber.

    This head is running on a low 9 second drag race car.


  8. #58
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    Quote Originally Posted by Rs1 View Post
    I...the pics in this thread are......not exactly pin point accurate,
    will this make any differance?
    As I learn more about combustion I learn what effect in cylinder swirl has on flame kernel
    development. Large scale flow (swirl or tumble) will stretch the developing flame, this is
    good for combustion to a point , too much large scale flow can cause flame quench and
    misfire.

    With many of my current groove layouts I try to determine large scale flow and aim the
    grooves into the area of the flame stretch as opposed to in the area of the spark plug.





    Quote Originally Posted by Rs1 View Post
    ...how do we know the speed and spread of the flame front is not
    already at a optimal amount and what we would be doing by making the cuts isn't actually
    taking away from the end result...
    A good indicator is ignition advance requirements for maximum torque. The lower the ignition
    advance requirements are the more efferent the chamber and faster the flame speed is.

  9. #59
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    duplicate

  10. #60
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NORTH LONDON
    Posts
    2,221
    Drives
    Calibra Turbo
    Hello mr automotivebret... If an 4v chamber such as LET has a small squish area, how about grooveing the piston top?

    It is nicely dome/dish!

    Will this benefit the burn?
    111 BHP@6,300 - 121 Ib-ft@2,500 - 3,200 from a 1400 SR with modified C14SE head, weber 32/34 on varijet inlet manifold, magnex 2" bore S/S exhaust system! Woohoo

  11. #61
    Rs1
    Rs1 is offline
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    8,007
    Drives
    LET...coming soon
    Cheers automotivebreat(h)...lol. I thought you were angled slightly off point of igniton, now i'm begining to understanding why.
    "THE ROB"

  12. #62
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    Quote Originally Posted by B8 GHY View Post
    ... If an 4v chamber such as LET has a small squish area,
    how about grooveing the piston top? It is nicely dome/dish!

    Will this benefit the burn?
    Yes, benifits can be found with piston modifications, got pictures?

    Need pictures of piston and head.

  13. #63
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    Quote Originally Posted by Rs1 View Post
    Cheers automotivebreat(h)...lol. I thought you were angled slightly off point of igniton, now i'm begining to understanding why.
    By now you may have guessed, I occasionally step "out side the box".

    Here's a few of my own layouts, designed to balance combustion temperatures and
    enhance combustion in "dead" areas of the chamber.








    The administrator decided not to leave room for the (h)... Tull, showing my age!

  14. #64
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NORTH LONDON
    Posts
    2,221
    Drives
    Calibra Turbo
    Whats heads are you showing us?

    They have bloodly big squish band, I can see these heads will benefit loads with grooves.

    As for pictures of a LET piston... I dont have any but im sure someone here does
    111 BHP@6,300 - 121 Ib-ft@2,500 - 3,200 from a 1400 SR with modified C14SE head, weber 32/34 on varijet inlet manifold, magnex 2" bore S/S exhaust system! Woohoo

  15. #65
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    Quote Originally Posted by B8 GHY View Post
    Whats heads are you showing us?

    They have bloodly big squish band, I can see these heads will benefit loads with grooves.
    Yes more grooves provide more of the same benefit.

    Most of my work is on after market wedge heads for American made V8 engines, primarily
    small block Chevrolet. Those seeking high performance utilize every bit of the available
    squish area to their benefit.

    The OEM would reduce the squish area and lower the compression ratio with a dished
    piston. These pictures are from the production engine in my tow truck.




  16. #66
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    50
    Drives
    Calibras 8V & Turbo
    C20LET pistons:










    C20LET chambers:




    This is a turbo engine with 0.6-0.8 bar (8.7-11.6 psi // 17.7-23.6 inHg) standard max boost pressure.

  17. #67
    Moderator Nobbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead
    Posts
    10,834
    Drives
    Mk3 Astra GSi X
    Do you not have to worry about possible 'hot spots', which may lead to det in a turbo engine?
    Insert Witty Comment Here--->.............

  18. #68
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    chester/n.wales
    Posts
    3,220
    Drives
    class 7 corsa;)
    looking at one of the last few pics, you have one where you have three grooves, going towards the valve....it looks aloost like your on the seat? couldnt that cause potential seat failure, after a certain time?

    i may be wrong on this!!

  19. #69
    MIGClub Member spanishfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    South London/ Surrey
    Posts
    26,409
    Drives
    ACT Nova TBs &m
    Enjoying this thread!
    www.shonkyopels.de with VAVAVOOM
    The opel club the french want to invade.

  20. #70
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    50
    Drives
    Calibras 8V & Turbo
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobbie View Post
    Do you not have to worry about possible 'hot spots', which may lead to det in a turbo engine?
    The opposite is true, detonation threshold is raised.

    Volvo turbo after grooving with this pattern:

    Quote Originally Posted by Morten VJ from Turbobricks

    After 2 weeks of driving with the groves.
    This is my results.
    I'm able to use the same boost pressure on regular, as i had with premium petrol before.
    220 kpa with the same timing.

    Fuel consumption.
    Before 28 Mpg Imp. Best.
    After 32 Mpg Imp and i'm still tuning.

    AFR before at cruise 16-1
    After at cruise 17.5-1 and nothing strange drivability problems.
    I'm going to try 18-1 next week if i can burn it.

    So far i'm Happy.
    http://forums.turbobricks.com/showth...t=74370&page=3


    Please notice that Volvo 2V open bathtub chamber with parallel valves is far more detonation sensitive than the C20LET 4V pentroofs.

  21. #71
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    Quote Originally Posted by TELVM View Post
    C20LET chambers:

    If I were modifying this engine, I would groove the cylinder heads to direct squish flow
    high into the roof of the chamber. The valve angles of this design creates a tall chamber,
    this is undesirable for optimal flame travel. Benefits can be found by encouraging
    additional mixture motion in the vicinity of the spark plug.

    Additional mixture motion in the dish of the piston of this engine design will generate
    improved combustion, to what extent I don’t know.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nobbie View Post
    Do you not have to worry about possible 'hot spots', which may lead to det in a turbo engine?


    The spark plug ground electrode glows red at sustained peak torque, next comes a
    poorly seated exhaust valve. Most other surfaces provide sufficient heat sink to avoid
    pre-ignition.

    Quote Originally Posted by philip2 View Post
    looking at one of the last few pics, you have one where you have three grooves, going towards the valve....it looks aloost like your on the seat? couldnt that cause potential seat failure, after a certain time?

    i may be wrong on this!!

    To an extent, I share the same concerns. I am a brave soul.

  22. #72
    Moderator Nobbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead
    Posts
    10,834
    Drives
    Mk3 Astra GSi X
    Interesting!
    But i suppose to find out the optimum, without trial and error you need to see where the current squish is happening, so you can 100% find the best angle for your grooves.
    Insert Witty Comment Here--->.............

  23. #73
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14
    Drives
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobbie View Post
    Interesting!
    But i suppose to find out the optimum, without trial and error you need to see where the current squish is happening, so you can 100% find the best angle for your grooves.
    Unfortunately we don’t have the resources needed to “see” what’s happening inside the active
    cylinder. This forces us to use the work of others and fill in the void with our “imagination”.


  24. #74
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    50
    Drives
    Calibras 8V & Turbo
    Some possible groove patterns for the C20XE/C20LET head I'd suggest. From left to right, conservative to all-out.


  25. #75
    MIGWeb User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Near Oxford
    Posts
    4,097
    Drives
    E30 24v Turbo, BTCC
    Interesting subject

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts