i see your thinking rodg. if they channel charge into the plug on the compression phase why not back out on the fire/expansion phase.
having said that, it might actually help distribute the expanding force over the piston face
i see your thinking rodg. if they channel charge into the plug on the compression phase why not back out on the fire/expansion phase.
having said that, it might actually help distribute the expanding force over the piston face
Thanks Lee, I really appreciate your attention to my concerns.
1) Enhance in-chamber turbulence at low and middle rpms, so improving combustion speed & quality, thus increasing torque and mpg. Detonation threshold is raised, with same octane fuel you can up the sCR or the boost without pinging. As a matter of fact the recipe for N/A engines is to raise sCR one half to a full point when cutting the grooves. EGTs are lowered (more complete combustion). Partial throttle AFRs can be leaned. Spark plugs remain clean (old dirty plugs are cleaned by the grooves).whats the cut for?
2) Provide the flame kernel a straighter path to the piston ring under the squish pad zone, thus improving ring seal. Oil remains clean for longer.
A legitimate fear that I shared before testing, but the empirical fact is grooves raise detonation threshold.A slit like that would also have several sharp edges = det hotspots.
They work both ways depending on the phase, compression or expansion.if they channel charge into the plug on the compression phase why not back out on the fire/expansion phase.
You can bet they do.having said that, it might actually help distribute the expanding force over the piston face
A Google search with 'singh + grooves' will render more information and feedback from users, from racing dragsters to heavy pick-ups.
wow, that my learing for the day over!! nice info.
www.wix.com/vxlgsi/zxr-750-r
had a look for the head today, one half has been thrown away, but the other one is believed to be at a mates house, so you may have to wait another week but i will find it and take pics!
Thanks a lot for your efforts Lee, I'll wait.
Nice to see someone trying something a bit different on the XE/LET
I would be worried about the effects at high RPM though, but can see the potential for benefits for economy.
Definately keep us updated with how you get on as its not something ive ever tried personally.
For no nonsense hardcore vauxhall modifying advice: www.VauxSport.com
My Total-Vauxhall Magazine Staff Nova in the www.VauxSport.com garage
My Total-Vauxhall Magazine Staff Calibra in the www.VauxSport.com garage
Its THICK... This is an image from the slice lee303 was on about...
![]()
Brian Sidebotham.
That's exactly what I needed!Thanks a lot gentlemen!
![]()
![]()
![]()
ah, there she is, cheers for posting that brian![]()
ive seen a massive thread on this on an american volvo forum ( yes cutting edge of tuning lol ) but im buggered if i can find it again
I run a small part time porting shop for the local drag racers, southern Louisiana. Nearly
100% of my work is on kidney shaped combustion chambers of after market heads for
American V8 engines.
With this design the grooves work extremely well. Allows higher compression on the fuel in
use, leaner air fuel mixtures and reduced ignition timing advance. The idea has caught on
so well I now groove nearly 100% of the heads that come into the shop.
![]()
hmmm, I see the point of it now, after seeing it in an 2valve chamber. That's pretty ingenious.
Probably not much advantage on a 16v pent head though, as 0ddball says.
Brian Sidebotham.
As allways an interesting topic. The grooves or "squish jets" are well proven to increase in-cylinder turbulence resulting in improved output, fuel economy and reduced emissions. Amount of turbulence is dependent on the squish area and groove design. Most research has been conducted with the piston crowns grooved/machined rather than the cylinder head. This allows easy assessment of different groove/jet designs.
Engines with this type of modification for fast burn can use less spark advance and tolerate lower fuel octane/high compression ratios without knock.
Research in this field has been conducted since the 80's.
Two research papers worth looking at:
SAE 1999-01-3664 "An Experimental Investigation on a New Squish Jet-Turbulence Combustion Chamber for SI Engine"
SAE 921545 "Combustion Chamber Design for a Lean-burn SI Engine"
very intresting read!
Thanks Stefan, I was able to read paper 1999-01-3664 on the in piston squish jet
combustion chamber here’s the results:
Compared to the engine with the bathtub combustion chamber, the experimental
investigation shows that engine with the squish jet turbulence combustion chamber
gives better comprehensive performance. The combustion process shortens, the lean
burn limit extends. At WOT speed characteristics, the maximum power output
increases by 25.7%, the average specific fuel consumption decreases by 12.9%
and the average emissions of HC, CO and NOx decrease by 31.4%, 91% and 5.6%
respectively
wow thats incredible !!
I may even try this on mine when i whip the head off next !!
Do you guys reckon its relatively 'safe' to do, i mean is there much room to **** things up ??
I have read that 8v volvo heads really benefit, pulling from low revs increases dramatically, never knew people did it on 16v heads !!
I assume without skimming the head, the added cuts lower the CR ever so slightly, which counter-acts any peformance benefit ?? Or does that depend too much on mapping&fuel type etc ?!
Another thing - how would a standard motronic dizzy xe feel about this - is it too small a change for it to worry about
![]()
78 Kadett C 2.0 8v turbo
Good gen, any more about![]()
www.shonkyopels.de
I found this picture of a modified 4V chamber on the net, I was very impressed with
the idea and quality of workmanship. I decided to give something similar a try on a
2V small block Chevy chamber.
For best results the grooves are combined with more compression, leaner air fuel
mixture and sometimes reduced ignition advance.
![]()
That's a Mitsubishi Eclipse head. The artist is the friend of a friend of mine, 'Synchro' from Clubjapo . He's currently finishing engine reassembly after turbo conversion and tons of mods.
More pics of this head, click to enlarge:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I love diy mods like this A couple of questions though....what denotes the placement, angle, depth and amount of grooves? Ive noticed on the 2v head the cuts are angled more so toward the inlet valve, then on the 4v head you have more cut on the inlet than the exhaust side.....is there a formula/resoning behind this?
"THE ROB"
111 BHP@6,300 - 121 Ib-ft@2,500 - 3,200 from a 1400 SR with modified C14SE head, weber 32/34 on varijet inlet manifold, magnex 2" bore S/S exhaust system! Woohoo
OK, yeah i get that its trying to focus the charge toward the point of ignition but just of looking at those pics i was wondering if there was an exact science to the placement of the cuts. If you draw multiple lines through each cut you'll notice they dont actually line up with the point of igniton...there close but as there are both not angled spot on and in both cases(2v&4v) the disruption of flow down each cut will....nulify the effect??
"THE ROB"